Key Takeaways

  • Biochar Recharges Water Cleaning: Adding biochar (a special charcoal) can continuously recharge”the iron needed for certain water purification processes, making them much more efficient.
  • Lower-Temp Biochar Works Best: Biochar at a lower temperature (450°C) was highly effective at cleaning water, while biochar made at high temperatures (750°C) failed completely.
  • Specific Ingredients Matter Most: The low-temp biochar worked best because it retained specific active ingredients (surface oxygen groups and free radicals) that are essential for the reaction and are burned off at high heat.
  • Wood Ash Is a Powerful Additive: Mixing wood ash into the raw material before cooking it into biochar created a final product that cleaned water 10 times faster than biochar made without it.
  • Ash Creates Built-in Recharging Stations: The ash helped form tiny, reactive iron minerals (like magnetite) directly inside the biochar, dramatically boosting its ability to power the water-cleaning reaction.

Cleaning contaminated water often involves powerful oxidation processes, like Fenton-like systems using persulfate ) activated by iron ions. These systems generate highly reactive species that can break down stubborn organic pollutants. However, the efficiency can be limited because the activating iron (II) quickly turns into less reactive iron (III). Adding redox-active biochar can help by reducing Fe(III) back to Fe(II), keeping the reaction going. But biochars vary widely depending on what they are made from (feedstock) and how they are made (pyrolysis conditions). Identifying the best biochar for this job is still an open question. Researchers Yiling Zhuang, Stefan B. Haderlein, and colleagues investigated this by testing different biochars’ ability to activate persulfate with Fe(III) to degrade the common insect repellent DEET. Their study was published in Separation and Purification Technology.

The team systematically compared eight different biochars. Four were made from beech wood pyrolyzed at different temperatures (450°C, 600°C, 750°C) and under different nitrogen gas flow rates (low vs. high flow at 450°C). The other four were made from softwood sawdust pyrolyzed at 500°C, but with varying amounts of wood ash (0%, 9%, 16%, or 43% by weight) mixed in before pyrolysis. They then tested how quickly each biochar, in combination with Fe(III) and persulfate, could break down DEET in water at a controlled pH of 2.5. They also characterized the biochars extensively to understand which properties were responsible for better performance, looking at things like electron donating capacity (EDC), surface functional groups (via FTIR), persistent free radicals (PFRs, via ESR), electrical conductivity, and mineral content (via XRD) .

The results showed a clear impact of pyrolysis temperature. Beech wood biochar produced at the lowest temperature (BC450, 450°C) was the most effective, transforming 88% of the DEET within two hours, with a half-life of just 39 minutes. Increasing the pyrolysis temperature drastically reduced efficiency; BC600 (600°C) resulted in a much slower half-life of 227 minutes, and BC750 (750°C) showed no DEET transformation at all. Interestingly, while the high-temperature BC750 had the highest overall electron donating capacity (EDC) and electrical conductivity, it failed to activate the system effectively . The superior performance of the low-temperature BC450 was attributed to its higher concentration of specific redox-active moieties: surface oxygen functional groups (like phenolic and carboxyl groups, detected by FTIR) and persistent free radicals (PFRs) . These features appear crucial for facilitating the Fe(III)/Fe(II) cycling needed to activate persulfate, correlating well with the observed DEET transformation rates. The high nitrogen flow rate during pyrolysis (BC450HF vs BC450) had only a minor effect on performance.

Amending the softwood feedstock with wood ash before pyrolysis dramatically improved performance. All ash-amended biochars outperformed the non-amended control (BC-ash0). The biochar with 16 wt% ash amendment (BC-ash16) showed the best results, achieving a DEET half-life of just 27 minutes—10 times faster than the non-ash amended biochar (BC-ash0) produced under the same conditions. This enhanced performance correlated strongly with increased EDC and a greater ability to reduce Fe(III) to Fe(II).. Characterization revealed that ash amendment led to the formation of crystalline iron minerals like hematite and magnetite within the biochar structure. These minerals, especially the mixed-valent magnetite, likely provide additional redox-active sites that boost Fe(III) reduction. Furthermore, the type of PFRs shifted slightly in ash-amended biochars towards potentially more reactive semiquinone radicals. The top performance of BC-ash16 is hypothesized to result from an optimal combination of these newly formed iron minerals, abundant PFRs, and remaining oxygen functional groups, creating a highly effective catalyst for the Fe(III)/persulfate system.

This study highlights that simply maximizing bulk properties like EDC or conductivity isn’t enough; the type and abundance of specific redox-active moieties, heavily influenced by pyrolysis conditions and feedstock amendments, are key. Low pyrolysis temperatures favor the retention of crucial oxygen functional groups and PFRs. Furthermore, adding wood ash before pyrolysis is a highly effective strategy to create biochars with enhanced redox properties, likely due to the in-situ formation of reactive iron minerals. These findings provide valuable insights for producing “designer” biochars with tailored properties optimized for enhancing Fenton-like water treatment processes.


Source: Zhuang, Y., Haderlein, S. B., Hagemann, N., Grafmüller, J., Gogler, K., Paul, A., Fink, F., & Spahr, S. (2025). Activation of persulfate by biochar and iron: Role of biochar pyrolysis conditions and ash amendments. Separation and Purification Technology, 374, 133634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133634

  • Shanthi Prabha V, PhD is a Biochar Scientist and Science Editor at Biochar Today.


Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Biochar Today

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading