Rice cultivation, a global staple, traditionally relies on flooding, a practice that significantly contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane (CH4​). A recent study in Soil & Tillage Research by Antonio López-Piñeiro, Damián Fernández-Rodríguez, Luis Vicente, David Peña Abades, Ángel Albarrán Liso, Jose Manuel Rato Nunes, and David Paulo Fangueiro, investigates sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate these emissions in Mediterranean rice crops. The research explored the effects of different irrigation methods (permanent flooding and sprinkler) and tillage practices (conventional tillage and no-tillage), with and without biochar application (28 t ha−1), on CH4​, carbon dioxide (CO2​), and nitrous oxide (N2​O) emissions.

The study found that flooding irrigation led to substantial CH4​ emissions, averaging 350 kg CH4​−C ha−1 across treatments. In contrast, sprinkler irrigation acted as a CH4​ sink, with a mean value of −2.40 kg CH4​−C ha−1. This stark difference highlights how anaerobic conditions in flooded fields promote methanogenesis, while aerobic conditions under sprinkler irrigation inhibit CH4​ production and facilitate its oxidation. However, the transition from flooding to sprinkler irrigation, regardless of tillage, significantly increased N2​O emissions, reaching up to 0.7 kg N2​O−N ha−1. This is consistent with sprinkler irrigation favoring nitrification, a process that promotes N2​O emissions.

Biochar application proved crucial in counteracting the rise in N2​O emissions under sprinkler irrigation, bringing values statistically similar to those of permanent flooding. Specifically, N2​O emissions in sprinkler irrigation with soil tillage and biochar (SST-B) were 3.70 times lower than in SST in the short term, and 2.73 times lower in the medium term. Similarly, sprinkler irrigation with no-tillage and biochar (SSNT-B) showed N2​O emissions 2.83 and 2.57 times lower than SSNT in fresh and aged effects, respectively. This reduction is hypothesized to be due to biochar increasing soil pH, which enhances the activity of the N2​O reductase enzyme, converting more N2​O to N2​. Additionally, biochar’s pore structure can adsorb NH-N, reducing its bioavailability for nitrification and subsequently decreasing N2​O emissions.

The Global Warming Potential (GWP) varied significantly among treatments. The conventional flood irrigation with soil tillage (FST) had the highest GWP at 17.8 Mg CO2​ eq ha−1. Transitioning to intermittent sprinkler irrigation notably reduced GWP, primarily due to lower CH4​ emissions. In the medium term (2019), FST-B showed a 34% GWP reduction compared to FST, with values decreasing from 21.5 Mg CO2​ eq ha−1 in 2018 to 12.9 Mg CO2​ eq ha−1 in 2019, demonstrating the stronger mitigating effect of aged biochar. The lowest yield-scaled GWP (GWP-y) was consistently observed under the SST-B treatment.

Biochar also positively influenced the Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB), contributing to a further rise regardless of irrigation and tillage methods. While non-amended treatments generally showed negative NECB values, indicating carbon output exceeding input, biochar-amended treatments had higher carbon inputs. For example, biochar application increased the organic matter content by 21,588 kg C ha−1 in the first year.


Source: López-Piñeiro, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, D., Vicente, L., Peña Abades, D., Albarrán Liso, A., Rato Nunes, J. M., & Fangueiro, D. P. (2025). Biochar enhances mitigation of CH_4 and N_2O emissions from rice fields under different irrigation and tillage managements. Soil & Tillage Research, 253, 106660.


Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Biochar Today

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading